News and Views on Tibet

High school boys detained by China for pro-Tibet slogans still missing

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter

New York, September 22: Human Rights Watch called on China on Thursday to immediately release seven Tibetan high school students it said had been detained on suspicion of writing pro-Tibetan independence slogans.

The seven students studied at a village school in one of China’s official “Tibetan autonomous” areas in Gansu Province and were among some 40 students detained by police on or around Sept. 7, the rights group said.

The boys were alleged to have written slogans calling for the return of the Dalai Lama and a free Tibet the previous day on the walls of the police station and other buildings in Amchok Bora village, the watchdog said.

China took power of the Himalayan region in 1950 and has since refused to allow the 71-year-old Dalai Lama — revered as Tibetan Buddhism’s highest spiritual authority — to return home.

While most of the students were released within 48 hours, officials in Xiahe County had refused to reveal the location of the seven still missing or even confirm that they were in custody, Human Rights Watch said.

“Arresting teenagers for a political crime shows just how little has changed in Tibet,” said Brad Adams, the group’s Asia director.

“Beating up a child for a political crime shows just how far China has to go before it creates the `harmonious society’ China’s leaders talk so much about,” he said.

The seven are all aged 14 or 15, according to the rights group.

One of the alleged detainees was reported to have been badly beaten during or after his arrest, the New York-based watchdog said.

“To end this embarrassing and abhorrent episode, the Chinese government should immediately release the boys, protect them and their parents from further abuse and explain why they were treated so harshly,” Adams said.

The group described the arrests as “the latest example of an increasingly harsh response from Chinese authorities to the slightest hints of dissent.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *